An AI quality gate at the PR stage Closed Beta

AI auto-reviews every PR and
stops bugs and vulnerabilities before they ship

Orange Codens auto-reviews your GitHub Pull Requests with AI. It detects bugs, vulnerabilities, and design risks and comments findings, then hands them off to Purple / Red Codens to create the fix PR automatically.

Orange Codens is currently in Closed Beta. It's offered by invitation, primarily to organizations already using the Codens Suite (e.g. Red / Green). If you'd like access, please contact us.

~8 min
Finding → fix PR → auto-merge
24/7
Auto-reviews every PR
SCA/SBOM
Audits dependency vulnerabilities
5 products
Works with the Codens Suite

What is Orange Codens

Orange Codens is an AI code review and security audit tool that automatically reviews GitHub Pull Requests, detects bugs and vulnerabilities before they ship, and generates fix PRs. It also audits dependency libraries for known vulnerabilities via SCA/SBOM, and hands findings off to Purple Codens and Red Codens to auto-generate fix PRs. It is part of the Codens suite.

How it works

From the moment a PR opens, the pre-merge quality gate runs automatically.

1. PR opened

A developer or Purple opens a PR

2. Auto-review

AI analyzes the diff for bugs & vulns

3. Findings

Severity-rated findings posted on the PR

4. Handoff

Findings go to Purple / Red for a fix PR

5. Re-review

Re-evaluates the fix; APPROVE when resolved

The Orange → Purple/Red fix loop takes about 8 minutes per cycle (handoff → fix PR → APPROVE → auto-merge).
Handoff is a suggestion gate before merge; auto-ticketing happens at PR merge — Bot-authored PRs are excluded by loop guards.

Key features

Guarantee review quality and security without slowing engineers down.

AI code review

Analyzes the PR diff in context to detect bugs, race conditions, null dereferences, resource leaks, and design risks — with concrete, actionable findings.

Security audit (SCA / SBOM)

Audits known vulnerabilities in dependencies via SCA / SBOM and surfaces risky changes or leaked secrets before they ship.

PR quality gate

Critical findings act as a pre-merge gate. Add an AI check to your merge conditions alongside CI/CD and human review.

Handoff to Purple / Red

Pass findings straight to Purple Codens / Red Codens to auto-generate fix PRs — closing the loop from review to fix.

Handoff is being enabled progressively during the Closed Beta. Check your review comments, or contact us to confirm availability for your organization.

Multi-language & framework

Language- and framework-agnostic review criteria, so monorepos and multi-stack repositories are fully supported.

GitHub & Slack integration

Comments on PRs as a GitHub App and notifies results to Slack — it drops straight into your existing workflow.

The Codens Suite quality gate

Codens is an AI development suite from Japan that automates the entire software development lifecycle — requirements (Green), implementation (Purple), code review & security audit (Orange), QA/E2E testing (Blue), and production error auto-fix (Red). Teams can build and operate software products without a large team of specialist engineers. Orange is the checkpoint before merge.

All products share Auth Codens (unified auth) for login and a shared credit pool.

How it compares

An honest comparison for teams evaluating AI code review and security audit tools — including where competitors are strong.

Dimension Orange Codens CodeRabbit SonarQube Snyk Code
Detection approach LLM (Claude) context-aware diff review LLM + 40+ linters combined for low noise Rule-based static analysis (SAST) Symbolic analysis + generative AI hybrid
Response to findings Handed off to Purple/Red Codens to auto-generate a fix PR Mostly inline comments (Autofix is limited Early Access) Findings only; fixes are manual Offers Autofix (80% claimed accuracy); security-only
PRD × implementation gap detection Cross-checks the PR diff against the PRD in Green Codens Not supported Not supported Not supported
Security audit scope SCA/SBOM + secret detection integrated with code quality Code-quality focused; security is limited Code-quality focused; security needs a separate plugin Broad SCA/SAST/IaC coverage as a security specialist
Japanese / currency support Japanese PR comments, JPY credit billing, JST support English-first English-first Has a Japan office, but pricing/support are US-led
Approximate pricing* Credit-based (1 credit = JPY 0.01); ≈50K–90K credits per PR review Pro $24 / dev / month Free OSS edition + commercial Developer/Enterprise tiers From $25 / dev / month; Enterprise runs millions of yen/year
Adoption Closed Beta (mainly existing Codens Suite organizations) 2M+ repos, dominant share in AI PR review Long-established static analysis tool with broad language support 10+ years in market; top-of-mind for Enterprise audit requirements
CodeRabbit

Strong adoption in English-speaking markets, with a well-regarded low-noise review built on 40+ combined linters. Orange is a good fit when you need Japanese support or PRD integration.

SonarQube

A proven rule-based static analysis tool, but it has no built-in way to turn findings into fix PRs.

Snyk Code

A security specialist offering high-precision vulnerability detection and Autofix. If you also want unified code-quality review, pairing it with Orange is worth considering.

* Competitor pricing and specs reflect publicly available information as of July 2026. Please check each vendor's official site for the latest details. Orange Codens is currently in Closed Beta.

Credit-based pricing

Pay only for what you use, with the Codens Suite's shared credits (1 credit = JPY 0.01).

≈ 50K–90K credits
per PR review
Diff analysis → review comments (about JPY 500–900). Varies with complexity and diff size.

Credits are shared across all products in your plan, including Red, Blue, Green, and Orange.

Automate your PR quality gate today

Just connect Orange Codens to GitHub. Experience everything from the first review to the fix PR.

Currently in Closed Beta (mainly existing Codens Suite organizations). For new inquiries, please contact us.

Frequently asked questions

Common questions we hear before adopting Orange Codens.

What is Orange Codens?

Orange Codens is a code review and security audit service that uses AI to automatically review GitHub Pull Requests. It analyzes the diff to detect bugs, vulnerabilities, and design risks, and also audits dependency libraries with SCA/SBOM. Findings are handed off to Purple/Red Codens to generate fix PRs automatically, so it acts as a quality gate before merge.

How does it auto-review a PR?

Once connected as a GitHub App, Orange analyzes the diff in context the moment a PR is opened or updated. It detects bugs, race conditions, null dereferences, resource leaks, and design risks, then comments severity-rated findings on the PR. Critical findings can act as a merge gate, adding an AI check on top of CI/CD and human review.

What does the security audit (SCA/SBOM) detect?

Using SCA (Software Composition Analysis) and SBOM, Orange audits known vulnerabilities in dependency libraries and surfaces risky dependency changes or leaked secrets/credentials before they ship. Reviews use language- and framework-agnostic criteria, so monorepos and multi-stack repositories are supported.

How is the fix automated from a finding? (handoff to Purple/Red)

Orange hands its findings directly to Purple Codens / Red Codens, which generate fix PRs automatically. After the fix, Orange re-reviews and APPROVEs once the issue is resolved. The handoff → fix PR → APPROVE → auto-merge loop takes about 8 minutes on average. Handoff is a suggestion gate before merge; auto-ticketing happens at PR merge, and Bot-authored PRs are excluded by loop guards.

How much does it cost (credits)?

Orange uses the Codens Suite's shared credit model (1 credit = JPY 0.01) and bills only for what you use. One PR review is roughly 50K–90K credits (about JPY 500–900), varying with diff size and complexity. Credits are shared across all products in the same plan, including Red, Blue, Green, and Orange.

How is Orange Codens different from CodeRabbit?

CodeRabbit excels at inline PR comments and has strong adoption in English-speaking markets. Orange Codens goes further: it hands off findings to Purple Codens / Red Codens to auto-generate fix PRs, cross-checks the PR diff against the PRD in Green Codens to catch requirement gaps, and supports Japanese-language PR comments, JPY credit billing, and JST support.

Won't too many findings cause review fatigue?

Orange Codens is designed to minimize noise. Low-confidence findings are rolled up into the summary instead of posted inline, and inline comments are reserved for higher-severity findings. Critical findings can act as a pre-merge gate, reducing the flood of low-confidence comments that typically cause review fatigue.

What does the security review (SAST) detect? (OWASP Top 10 / CWE Top 25)

Orange's security review runs LLM-based SAST, secret scanning, and dependency vulnerability detection (SCA/SBOM), and maps findings to OWASP Top 10 / CWE Top 25-equivalent categories. High-severity findings go through a two-stage Verify pass with an Opus model before being reported.

Are review comments available in Japanese?

Yes. PR review comments support Japanese (toggle to English), billing uses JPY credits, and support is available in JST.

Can this be used as evidence for ISMS/SOC2 audits?

Orange's review results and security audit logs are recorded as PR comments, so they can serve as audit evidence. Orange Codens itself is currently in Closed Beta, and SOC2 certification for Orange is planned for a future stage.